alternatives

Lorikeet alternatives (2026)

The cheapest alternative to Lorikeet is Vapi ($0.05/min (platform fee; +model & telephony pass-through)). If you want to self-host, Retell AI can run on your own infrastructure. Below: the strongest alternatives, ranked, with the real reason to switch.

closest cheaper pickVapi$0.05/min (platform fee; +model & telephony pass-through)
self-host pickRetell AI$0.07/min (usage-based; realistic all-in $0.13–$0.31/min)
total compared15managed and self-host options

Pricing decoded and verified 2026-05-31 against each vendor's live page; volatile figures flagged "verify live".

what you're leaving

Lorikeet is aI Customer Concierge built for complex, regulated companies like fintech and healthtech. Unlike basic deflection chatbots, Lorikeet resolves end-to-end support issues across chat, email, SMS, WhatsApp, and voice by following the same multi-step workflows and judgment your human agents use, taking actions like refunds, billing changes, and account updates. The drawback: Published Start/Scale prices require annual commitment, and the headline monthly number is only the platform fee. Actual spend is dominated by per-resolution credits that stack per channel (voice costs ~50 to 60% more per ticket than chat), plus separate per-ticket charges for routing/tagging and automated QA. There is no free trial; you must book a demo, and onboarding is implementation-heavy since the agent has to be wired into your workflows and systems before it resolves anything.

Visit links are affiliate links. We may earn a commission. It never changes the number we show you.

Ranked alternatives

Ordered by how cleanly they replace Lorikeet.

01

Relevance AI

vs Lorikeet

Built around multi-agent "teams" with a transparent dual meter.

self-hostNo mcpBoth modeldual-meter
$29/mo Visit →
02

Lindy

vs Lorikeet

The most hands-off "AI employee" with voice/phone, if you want done-for-you.

self-hostNo mcpBoth modelper-credit
$49.99/mo Visit →
03

11x

vs Lorikeet

11x sells autonomous "digital workers" for go-to-market teams. Alice is an AI SDR that runs outbound prospecting end to end (lead research and enrichment from 50+ sources, ICP matching, and multi-channel sequencing across email, LinkedIn, SMS and phone), while Julian handles inbound voice and chat qualification.

self-hostNo mcpNone modelper-worker annual contract, volume-based
$3,750 (Alice, billed annually)/mo Visit →
04

Fin by Intercom

vs Lorikeet

Fin (by Intercom) is an AI agent for customer service that resolves support conversations end-to-end across chat, email, voice and social. It can run standalone on top of an existing helpdesk (Zendesk, Salesforce, Freshdesk, Zoho Desk and others) or bundled inside Intercom's own platform.

self-hostNo mcpBoth modeloutcome-based per resolution
$0.99 per resolution (50 minimum)/mo Visit →
05

Decagon

vs Lorikeet

Enterprise AI customer service platform branded "the AI concierge for every customer." It deploys AI agents across chat, email, and voice, configured with natural-language Agent Operating Procedures (AOPs) instead of code. Used by large brands like Notion, Duolingo, Eventbrite, and Rippling to deflect and fully resolve high support volume.

self-hostNo mcpBoth modelusage-based, custom · per-conversation or per-resolution + platform fee
Custom (~$50,000/yr platform fee + usage)/mo Visit →
06

Sierra

vs Lorikeet

Enterprise "Agent OS" for customer experience. Sierra lets large brands build, optimize, personalize, and scale branded AI agents that resolve customer issues across chat, voice, SMS, WhatsApp, email and ChatGPT. Built by former Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor and former Google exec Clay Bavor.

self-hostNo mcpServer modelOutcome-based, you pay per successfully resolved conversation, plus a base platform fee
Custom (enterprise only); third-party estimates ~$150k+/yr plus $50k-$200k setup/mo Visit →
07

Vapi

vs Lorikeet

Developer-first voice AI platform for building, testing, and deploying low-latency phone and voice agents. Vapi orchestrates speech-to-text, an LLM, and text-to-speech behind one API, handling telephony, turn-taking, interruptions, and tool calling so you wire in your own providers.

self-hostNo mcpBoth modelper-minute usage (platform fee + model & telephony pass-through)
$0.05/min (platform fee; +model & telephony pass-through)/mo Visit →
08

Retell AI

vs Lorikeet

Retell AI is a developer-friendly AI voice agent platform for automating inbound and outbound phone calls. It bundles speech-to-text, a proprietary low-latency turn-taking model (~600ms), TTS, LLM orchestration, telephony, batch calling and post-call analytics into one usage-based stack you can run via a no-code dashboard or API.

self-hostYes mcpBoth modelper-minute usage (voice) + per-message (chat)
$0.07/min (usage-based; realistic all-in $0.13–$0.31/min)/mo Visit →
09

Bland AI

vs Lorikeet

Enterprise AI voice-agent platform that automates inbound and outbound phone calls 24/7 on Bland's own proprietary, vertically integrated stack (LLM, real-time STT, premium TTS/voice cloning, and telephony all in-house). Built for high-volume teams that need sub-second latency, full call observability, and SOC 2 / HIPAA / PCI compliance.

self-hostYes mcpBoth modelplan-based per-minute usage + platform fee
Free, then $299 + $0.12/min/mo Visit →
10

Chatbase

vs Lorikeet

No-code platform for building and deploying AI customer-support agents trained on your own data, deployable across website chat, WhatsApp, Slack, email, and voice/telephony. Agents resolve tickets, take actions via API (AI Actions), and escalate to a human when they hit their limits.

self-hostNo mcpNone modelTiered subscription with monthly message-credit allotments (free tier plus four paid tiers), plus usage-based overage credits
$32nth (Hobby, monthly billing)/mo Visit →
11

Tidio Lyro

vs Lorikeet

AI customer service agent ("the AI agent customers want to talk to") that resolves support questions using your own help content and knowledge base, with a claimed 67% average automation rate. Lyro Actions let it perform autonomous tasks like checking order status, starting returns, updating accounts, and qualifying leads, and it can connect to your CRM, billing, or database over MCP.

self-hostNo mcpClient modelfreemium SaaS + usage-based Lyro AI conversation add-on
$32.50 (Lyro AI add-on, 50 conversations/mo on annual billing)/mo Visit →
12

Synthflow

vs Lorikeet

Enterprise-ready, no-code AI voice agent platform for automating inbound and outbound phone conversations at scale. Positions as an end-to-end Voice AI platform with in-house telephony, a visual flow designer, and 200+ integrations across CRM, calendar, and helpdesk tools.

self-hostNo mcpServer modelper-minute usage, no flat fee
$0.00 base (Pay As You Go); pay per min/mo Visit →
13

Manychat

vs Lorikeet

No-code chat marketing automation platform for building AI-assisted chatbots and automated conversation flows across Instagram DM, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, TikTok, SMS, and email from one interface. Trigger-based flows (comments, story replies, keywords, links) turn social engagement into captured leads and sales conversations.

self-hostNo mcpNone modelFreemium, contact-scaled subscription tiers plus per-contact overage
$14 (Essential)/mo Visit →
14

Wonderful

vs Lorikeet

Enterprise AI agent platform for customer service, pairing a multi-model AI engine with on-the-ground local deployment teams to run multilingual voice, chat, and email agents that resolve customer requests at human level across 30+ markets. Sales-led and deployment-heavy, it reports an 80% resolve rate handling tens of thousands of requests a day.

self-hostNo mcpNone modelConsumption-based (usage/impact-aligned), no setup fees, custom quote only
Custom (quote-only)/mo Visit →
15

Avoca AI

vs Lorikeet

"The AI Front Office for Home Services," an always-on AI workforce for service businesses (HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and other trades) that answers every inbound call, text, and chat, qualifies urgency, checks technician availability, and books jobs straight into ServiceTitan or Housecall Pro 24/7. It also runs outbound re-engagement campaigns and scores CSR calls for coaching.

self-hostNo mcpNone modelSales-led custom quote, scales with call volume and CSRs
Custom/mo Visit →

Lorikeet vs the alternatives

The baseline against every option, decoded.

toolentry pricepricing modelfree tierself-hostmcp
Lorikeet baseline $1,500/mo (Start, billed annually)verify live outcome-based per resolution + monthly platform fee None, demo-led No Client
Relevance AI $29/mo dual-meter 200 actions/mo No Both
Lindy $49.99/mo per-credit 400 credits/mo No Both
11x $3,750/mo (Alice, billed annually) per-worker annual contract, volume-based None. No free plan or public trial No None
Fin by Intercom $0.99 per resolution (50/mo minimum) outcome-based per resolution 14-day trial, unlimited Fin, no card No Both
Decagon Custom (~$50,000/yr platform fee + usage) usage-based, custom · per-conversation or per-resolution + platform fee None. No free plan or self-serve trial; access requires a sales call. No Both
Sierra Custom (enterprise only); third-party estimates ~$150k+/yr plus $50k-$200k setup Outcome-based, you pay per successfully resolved conversation, plus a base platform fee None, no self-serve trial, enterprise sales only No Server
Vapi $0.05/min (platform fee; +model & telephony pass-through) per-minute usage (platform fee + model & telephony pass-through) No ongoing free tier, ~60 free minutes at signup No Both
Retell AI $0.07/min (usage-based; realistic all-in $0.13–$0.31/min) per-minute usage (voice) + per-message (chat) Yes. Free account with $10 in credits, 20 free concurrent calls, full platform access, pre-built agent templates and simulation testing, plus community and email support. Yes Both
Bland AI Free, then $299/mo + $0.12/min plan-based per-minute usage + platform fee Start plan, $0/mo, no card, 2 free credits Yes Both
Chatbase $32/month (Hobby, monthly billing) Tiered subscription with monthly message-credit allotments (free tier plus four paid tiers), plus usage-based overage credits Yes. Free plan: $0/mo, 50 message credits/mo, 1 agent (agents get deleted on inactivity) No None
Tidio Lyro $32.50/mo (Lyro AI add-on, 50 conversations/mo on annual billing) freemium SaaS + usage-based Lyro AI conversation add-on Yes. Free plan ($0/mo) includes 50 billable conversations/mo No Client
Synthflow $0.00/mo base (Pay As You Go); pay per min per-minute usage, no flat fee Free to build/test, pay on launch No Server
Manychat $14/mo (Essential) Freemium, contact-scaled subscription tiers plus per-contact overage Yes. Free plan: 25 contacts, 4 automations, 2 channels No None
Wonderful Custom (quote-only) Consumption-based (usage/impact-aligned), no setup fees, custom quote only None (no free tier, no self-serve sign-up; access is via sales) No None
Avoca AI Custom Sales-led custom quote, scales with call volume and CSRs None. No free trial and no self-serve sandbox or demo environment; access is sales-led only. No None

Dirr is independent and not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Lorikeet. Tool names and logos are the property of their respective owners. Figures are decoded from public pricing and dated; verify volatile prices on the vendor site before buying.

Questions

What is the best alternative to Lorikeet?

The cheapest alternative to Lorikeet is Vapi ($0.05/min (platform fee; +model & telephony pass-through)). For self-hosting, Retell AI can run on your own infrastructure. The right pick depends on whether you optimize for price, control, or hands-off automation.

Is there a free alternative to Lorikeet?

Yes. n8n is free if self-hosted, and Gumloop's free tier gives 5,000 credits/mo. Most listed tools have a free plan to test before paying.

Why switch from Lorikeet?

Common reasons: Published Start/Scale prices require annual commitment, and the headline monthly number is only the platform fee. Actual spend is dominated by per-resolution credits that stack per channel (voice costs ~50 to 60% more per ticket than chat), plus separate per-ticket charges for routing/tagging and automated QA. There is no free trial; you must book a demo, and onboarding is implementation-heavy since the agent has to be wired into your workflows and systems before it resolves anything.

More on Lorikeet